Is Semantic SEO the Marketers SEO?

This post looks at the cluttered web, filtering process that focus on meaning and quality in the form of semantic SEO, and simply good quality search marketing services – something we all can work towards. It’s a work-in-progress but I’d be keen to hear your thoughts. Thanks.

The rehashed bit…

Blurring the lines: brands in hands of the social web

Does semantic SEO exist? Most people would say that SEO is exactly that…SEO is semantically driven, as it is driven by the meaning of the words. Although this is only a relatively recent phenomenon in search engine’s information retrieval. It is not necessarily about keywords any more rather about key-meaning.

I needn’t explain why this is important but what I should do is explain it’s ramifications.

Most unoriginal statement of the century

Information on the internet is merging…uh oh here we go – heard this all before! Well it really is. (Sometimes we have to start from the obvious statements to build an argument!).

I want to remind everyone of how it used to be, in the good and / or bad old days…

Standalone websites > Internet in an Information Flux

Companies and websites used to operate online as standalone businesses, picking and choosing where their brand operated. Any brand that was mentioned in a forum or blog was relatively underground. This is a very important distinction compared to where we are now. Just think of the flux and flow of information on a topic – information is continually being encouraged to flow on and off a page through all forms of social media and the like. It can now take an increasingly wider array of forms, but what are the implications for online marketers?

The interesting bit…

Human and Bot Comprehension

We have become immune or numb to this information online, with clever neurological filters, but just think how radically it is different to a basic search engine’s comprehension of the web. Imagine the complexity of the information in it’s most raw form and then try to realise the complexity in evoking ‘meaning’.

Busy Crowd or Quiet Space? An online marketers conundrum

With websites taking various forms, everyone becoming a blogger and information transferring across various social media platforms, it provides a great deal of channels for marketers but so to a great deal of noise. For search engine marketers, this noise can be quite disruptive if we are using the same keywords and marketing techniques in similar ways. How can we stand-out? Does it mean fall into sync with your cluttered neighbourhood and unleash a torrent of content, or, leave some white space by stepping away from the crowd and promoting clarity of meaning? Both cases have been proved to be successful.

140 characters of clarity

Information rich societies are ultimately brand managers’ dream come true and nightmare all wrapped into one big ball of string. Brand managers love communicating clear messages, but are so too clearly misunderstood. Clarity rocks! Does 140 characters express a clear message, why yes, it certainly can. Can 140 characters express a clear message as it moves across the screen where 14 other conversations are taking place…maybe? My confidence in the clarity of the message communicated severely drops when I ask that question.

How can your website, your online presence in general maybe, take a form that markets your activity in a way that stands-out from the crowd, or even apart from the crowd? Your online activity, is your brand…what can you do consistently to represent your brand? Do you use the same colours for all your activity, the same images, same logos, the same presentation style? How often does McDonald’s change it’s logo?! These are the same triggers of recognition that provide visual meaning to your future contacts / network / clientele / friends.

Search Bots and Meaning

For the search engines that dominate the industry, they unfortunately don’t have the capacity to understand these characteristics…so they look elsewhere. In fact search bots have and do fail on many quality scores, focussing more on relevancy and popularity and NOT necessarily quality…hence the rise of social media sites, and more recently SearchWiki.

Search engines are coming around to latent semantic analysis highlighting the importance here, so this in itself makes it especially important in thinking along these lines.

In search marketing, quality is therefore quite obviously deemed to be important – it builds traffic and builds conversions. But what is quality in respect to search marketing? To me quality is something that has relative value regarding purpose and / or meaning. This is almost a definition of semantics.

Semantic HTML > SEO?

A guy I work with, Ben Hunt, from Web Design from Scratch, deliberately focusses on promoting website design that ‘Saves the Pixel’…using semantic concepts in coding and presentation. It works, and, he’s drawn a great deal of attention as a result.

He told me last weekend that he is currently researching [maybe you can help him out?] into semantic pixel saving, to see whether his hypothesis on the correlation between stickiness and semantic html is correct. Simplicity in design and marketing is certainly an option I like the sound of!

As search marketers this is something that we should certainly be interested in, but how can we expand it to be even more relevant to what we are working towards?

Search Marketing can take something away from this…

Semantic HTML might help tidy up the page, reduce the page load speed, increase cross-browser compatibility even…but there’s more to it than that for search marketing. Semantic-thinking, helps us see advantages of so many activities in search that already exist but aren’t always capitalised on…it helps us align our attention with what really matters: meaningful search quality.

Examples of Semantic SEO

I’d be keen to hear of people’s thoughts on the use of semantic-thinking in search engine optimisation, and how it feeds into everyday activities. These are my initial thoughts on semantic SEO anyway…

1. The use of long-tail terms would be one answer…long-tail keywords certainly get your message across clearly….but it’s still an under utilised facet of search marketing. A focussed long-tail strategy can create a great deal of quality, convertible traffic.
2. Thinking about keywords in greater detail, we can think about their role in the context of what has been said – our good old friend latent semantic analysis pops up it’s head again. Meaning is everything in search marketing – semantics in communication is therefore vital…
3. What about your landing pages? Are you focussed on who you are targeting. Have you ever written a landing page for [strictly] one purpose and [strictly] one outcome. I’ve not, although I probably should. One message, one call to action and one outcome…it would be an interesting exercise.  We so often provide too much information, and too many options.  This is why great designers are simply great at what they do: they can see what is necessary for the information to be communicated clearly.
4. Think about the page structure too…everything there regarding the order and layout of the content and code has weighted meaning.
5. Every sort of interaction of information (aka web and website information architecture) presents meaning to search engines…this is what we have to ALWAYS remember as SEO consultants. An example of this is where links act as a sort of funnel where surrounding text and anchor text’s meaning falls through the funnel and carries meaning through to the next page.

I expect there are dozens of examples, please feel to share where search marketers sometimes miss opportunities to express meaning in their day-to-day activity.

Competing on the grounds of meaning

We’re dealing with clutter by making more clutter, so essentially we are crowding the market by trying to stand-out from the crowd. The Tragedy of the Commons becomes all the more apparent as we allow our marketing activity to be driven in this way.

Digital space is essentially infinite, and it seems that we, online commerce and other competing organisations, are competing on grounds of size – scalability of content/keywords/links that drives traffic. And in essence this is how marketing has always been – a scalability game of reach, pick-up rates, visitors, etc. How about if we started competing more along the lines of meaning…scalability/presence plays a role, but more as a bi-product of producing meaning for all those parties your trying to draw attention to search engines.  I believe the best search marketers do this.

Semantic SEO ticks a whole lot of marketing boxes, regarding surfers, visitors and search bots. Shouldn’t this level of meaning be what we work towards as search marketers?  So is Semantic SEO the Marketers SEO?  Yes, I think it is.

[This piece is a work in progress, but I would gladly take feedback on the subject, so please feel free to share you thoughts...]

Could you Buy or Sell Social Media Profiles like Business Assets?

I have been thinking a lot about social media and brand management lately, with the rise of Google’s SearchWiki and growing commercial interest in Twitter and other social media sites, focusing on how to capitalise on or simply monetise this medium more.  Just think how many global social media sites reach right across cultures, countries, languages and interests, 1000’s are out there…

This also got me thinking that Social Media has been used for a whole lot of purposes regarding marketing online, and what appears to me to go a long way is the people who are deeply embedded into that specific social media site; those authority members who go straight to number one because of their credibility. Now, this says to me that this is essentially a huge benefit, an asset, maybe even a commodity that could be traded…without knowing anything more than that I did a couple of searches and voilà, there have been instances of social media profiles going up for sale. So why is this?

The commercial value of social media and credibility

An interview with a anonymous top Digg user suggests that companies / organisations are willing to pay up to $1,200 submission and promotion fees for the privilege of having access to this Digg users reach. OK, so this means that this Digg user, after just 2 years of membership, can take a very respectable income as a return for his credibility in this community, benefiting quite obviously for his participation. But it’s this obvious commercial affiliation that worries people so much.

Selling social profiles is not popular but happens

The sale of online community profiles raised a number of negative responses from the community of bloggers and social media proponents…but why? Here’s a couple of the responses, before I go onto expand that point…firstly, a more response on the selling of Facebook profiles by Social Media Butterfly:

Let me be abundantly clear – this is not what social media marketing is about. If you have to be sneaky about your brand, then something is wrong with your product!

There are a whole lot of responses to this comment, one might be that social media marketing like all forms of marketing is about exposure and there is a very good business case for this practice to occur. Or how about the remarks made by the Blog Herald, regarding another twitter profile for sale:

Personally, I find the whole thing insulting. I hate it enough when my favorite blogs change editorial hands. But to sell a profile or account, that people have chosen to follow, is just weak. I would immediately unsubscribe; and I have a hunch I’m not alone. Hence, making a potential buyer, pay the price.

Well the reasons that it’s not popular are quite obvious, but that does not mean to say it doesn’t happen.

Playing devils advocate, selling social media profiles is no different to buying an established website or business

We don’t like it when our favourite sandwich shop changes hands, we worry that the sandwiches won’t have the cucumber cut to the ‘right’ thickness or they add a splodge of mayo instead of a splidge…we don’t trust the newbie. In business though this happens, and so often consumers are unaware that a company has changes hands. Is this deceptive, in the same way a Twitter profile might change hands?

A social profile as a database for market research

We all know that famous saying ‘information if power’ and we know that consumer information has a real value across most markets, and information and databases are bought and sold, built-up and merged, very legally and legitimately.

This is a business interpretation of why this so freely happens:

• Businesses wish to learn about consumers in their market or future markets.
• By understanding their customers they can provide better goods and services
• We as the consumers potentially receive better goods and services as a result.

Christopher Penn raises the issue over social media profiles as databases of information for marketers, but any information captured online can become a database. My background in marketing leads me on to think about other examples of multiple forms of market research that occurs, sometimes unknowingly to the customer…

• Customer profiling using data in your shopping cart and contact forms
• Prospective ‘ideal customer’ research in high streets
• Keyword research, competitor research, off-site competitive analysis, trend watching
• Emails and telephone correspondence – use of language, requests, FAQ’s, etc
• Website Analytics, e.g. visitor loyalty metrics and site usage
• Website / blog polls
• Newsletter sign-up pages

…naturally, there are a wide variety of methods in which data is gathered on and offline. Is it consistently made clear that this data will / could be used for marketing purposes? Unlikely. So how is this explained to users, maybe via a passive privacy statement, P3P adoption, *small print? It’s not always too clear, is it?

Ethical buying and selling of social media profiles?

Now attaching this notion to the sale of information / profiles it becomes unclear as to whether this is indeed unethical, or maybe it happens all around on a degree already that it has become the norm?

However, can you sell these networks/relationships/connections that have been built (possibly) un-commercially or at least unknowing that the your online friendship will be sold to another with more commercial interests…there’s certainly something seedy about that.

So, as personal information is unknowingly being sold, is this one step too far?

T & C’s and ethical consequences of exchanging data via social profiles

The terms and conditions of many online communities and social media platforms typically disallow, either directly or indirectly, such practices and as soon as such profiles are put up for sale they are removed, hence devoiding their value as they simply don’t exist! This essentially means that this practice will, and probably has already, been driven underground.

Now, a point to promote a little paranoia in online communities…If a member of your network starts behaving a little oddly, maybe they’ve had their profile taken over by another party, but how would we ever know?! Just imagine if Guy Kawasaki sold his twitter profile, currently hovering around 30,000 followers and supposedly valued at about $10,000…he puts out a wild mixture of content, he’s always updating, would you really notice a mild change in links, ideas, content that hit’s the updates if it continues to be remarkable enough?  Paranoia alert!

Blackhat Social Media Marketing: the underground sale of social profiles

With so many articles discussing leveraging social media marketing as part of your online marketing tool kit, it’s no wonder that there is a market for pre-established social media profiles that carry so much weight.

So…..

Having run through this debate in my head, so many times now, it is the nature of the transaction that bothers me…the method in which the credibility and trust is sold. If the intention is made clear and public, I see this as less of a blackhat / greyhat exercise, but in doing so the profile fails to exist.

It will therefore occur underground, and unknowingly to the followers / social network that supports that profile. This deception of trust over a personal profile and associated network seems to me to devalue the respect of your target audience, and in doing this makes it unethical. I personally don’t follow the mantra ‘the business of business is business’, as that discounts far too many ethical principles. Businesses who don’t respect their target market ultimately loose out in the end.

If the profile is run on behalf of a business and exchanges hands as part of the sale of the business, I would not expect the same rules to apply. An example of this is that people’s intention to follow CNN are not following a personality but rather a global brand…this maybe automatically updates / non-personal updates, and is unlikely to offend if it were to change hands. Maybe there are better examples but I think people are likely to be more offended if they are following a person.

BUT, with all blackhat marketing activity a cost-benefit analysis will take place making the decision for them, i.e. the risk is worth it for the reward.

Possible other points of discussion?

Knowledge of what personal data is used and how – People and websites can naturally participate in the P3P policy programme as advocated by W3C, but my understanding is that consumer awareness and website adoption is very low (does anyone have any stats on P3P adoption as I couldn’t find any reputable / current statistics?).

P3P adoption has been very low, so does this mean that we as webmaster are less motivated to promote the use of visitors information than we are to cry out about the use (neither my site currently has adopted P3P as an example [it's on my list of jobs along with privacy policy], or the sites I quoted above…raises an interesting debate, I feel.

Google Analytics Data for sale – I also did a few searches for selling or buying site log files / Google Analytics data…this could add a great deal of value in the right hands, especially for instance a non-ecommerce site selling their Analytics data to an ecommerce site.

Would you sell you site Analytics data? If you were losing interest in Twitter, would you sell your profile (I’m not asking to buy it from you!)? Have your websites complied with P3P?

Can of worms

You may disagree and regard this practice of selling personal profiles as reasonable, and and even whitehat in nature? Many aspects of data are collected in the contact us forms, polls and web analytics  without the knowledge of consumers, so why not treat profiles as databases?

I realise I’ve picked up on a MASSIVE topic, colossal in fact, it is no wonder that I am struggling to keep this post short, as so many points can be expanded, and in this lack of detail there are a number of points that I could clearly add to. Maybe you would like to pull me up on some points; I’d be happy to hear your thoughts…